home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Atari Mega Archive 1
/
Atari Mega Archive - Volume 1.iso
/
lists
/
gem
/
l_0799
/
548
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-08-27
|
1KB
From: Mark Himsley <mdsh@cix.compulink.co.uk>
From: walra <@nl.net (Waldi Ravens):walra@moacs11>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 94 02:20 BST-1
From: Mark Himsley <mdsh@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: 20/06/94
To: gem-list@world.std.com
Message-Id: <memo.460265@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9406221744.A2853-0100000@grad>
From: walra <@nl.net (Waldi Ravens):walra@moacs11>
>In <memo.456084@cix.compulink.co.uk>, Mark Himsley wrote:
>> I am sure that users of UK Ataris know that + is shift =, so ^+ == shift^=
>Sure, but what is shift-ctrl-+ going to be on a uk keyboard?
>Press both shift keys? :-)
I think that SHIFT^<non alfa key> should kept away from.
>> >However, the current proposal
>> >does make the distinction between numpad and normal keys.
>> I realy don't see why.
>Neither do I, perhaps because many existing applications make the
>distinction. Anyway, I suggest this should be changed.
Good. =:-)
>> The only key that should work diffrently on the
>> numpad is Enter, as it does not appear elseware on the keyboard.
>Strangely enough this key is equivalent to Return in most applications.
Yeh, yeh, I know. I just meant that IF you wanted enter to != return then
that's okay, but for + <keyboard> to != + <numpad> is silly.
Mark H.
mdsh@cix.compulink.co.uk