home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Mark Himsley <mdsh@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- From: walra <@nl.net (Waldi Ravens):walra@moacs11>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 94 02:20 BST-1
- From: Mark Himsley <mdsh@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Subject: Re: 20/06/94
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- Message-Id: <memo.460265@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9406221744.A2853-0100000@grad>
-
-
- From: walra <@nl.net (Waldi Ravens):walra@moacs11>
-
- >In <memo.456084@cix.compulink.co.uk>, Mark Himsley wrote:
- >> I am sure that users of UK Ataris know that + is shift =, so ^+ == shift^=
- >Sure, but what is shift-ctrl-+ going to be on a uk keyboard?
- >Press both shift keys? :-)
-
- I think that SHIFT^<non alfa key> should kept away from.
-
- >> >However, the current proposal
- >> >does make the distinction between numpad and normal keys.
- >> I realy don't see why.
- >Neither do I, perhaps because many existing applications make the
- >distinction. Anyway, I suggest this should be changed.
-
- Good. =:-)
-
- >> The only key that should work diffrently on the
- >> numpad is Enter, as it does not appear elseware on the keyboard.
- >Strangely enough this key is equivalent to Return in most applications.
-
- Yeh, yeh, I know. I just meant that IF you wanted enter to != return then
- that's okay, but for + <keyboard> to != + <numpad> is silly.
-
- Mark H.
- mdsh@cix.compulink.co.uk
-
-